LaHood Encourages Cargo Airlines to Opt-in to New Flight & Duty Time Rules

LaHood Encourages Cargo Airlines to
Opt-in to New Flight & Duty Time Rules

WASHINGTON, February 3, 2012 – This week while speaking at the Aero
Club of Washington, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood was asked by the CAPA ( the Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations) Executive Vice President Lee Collins, about a statement he made in December when issuing the FAA's new rule on pilot flight and duty time. This new rule carved-out cargo carriers from mandatory implementation, but allows them to opt-in to the rule
voluntarily.

Question asked by the CAPA’s Captain Lee Collins ;

"On December 20th, you announced the new flight time duty
Time rule and at that time you committed to a process of meeting with
Management of the all-cargo airlines and asking for voluntary compliance with the new rules. We just wanted to know some more thoughts on that and possibly a way forward should there not be voluntary effort on their part."


Secretary LaHood answered the question by saying:

"I have invited our friends from the Cargo Airlines to come to my office and talk about really looking at the rule that we have adopted and implementing it.
We think it's important that they know what's in the rule and why it's
important and hear it from us and not read about it in the paper. And
I'm going to just ask them directly to be a part of it. I think they should
be. It's safe. Look, if everybody in this room believes in safety,
which we do and I know all of you do, I can't think of a reason why they
wouldn't want to do it. But we'll find out."

Interesting to note that of the 1500 or so major airline industry attendees, the legislative affairs group for UPS (United Parcel Service) and the Cargo Carriers Association were also in attendance, who may have not been pleased with Secretary LaHood’s response.

8 comments (Add your own)

1. Arun wrote:
Dear anonymous, thank you for your lcwardoy comments, because you know, you must be ***SO*** afraid to put a face to your name. Are you actually American Airlines? Nice job!We did use the record locator and guess what, it didn't work!And how can you ask for two wheelchairs at the spur of the moment without having much time to make quick decisions?But thank you, thank you, honestly from the bottom of my heart, anonymous, for pointing out even more things that could go wrong when you PAY FOR SERVICE that you don't get.And I'm so happy that you think it's ok for a MAJOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT to not provide seating for its patrons. Wow, you are a class act, you are! ADA should hire you as its spokesperson, awesome! Because you know, buying a chair for the airport is just what every traveler thinks about, in addition to everything that they have to deal with. I bet you've never been on an airplane.Please keep your inane comments coming. It's only going to reinforce my case.

Mon, March 12, 2012 @ 9:07 PM

2. Holly wrote:
disse:Que animal! Agora as artiodes le1 fora capricham mais nas publicae7f5es, por causa da competie7e3o com a internet. c9 uma maneira de ganhar leitores.Tem uma inglesa que chama Amelia's magazine. A diagramae7e3o e9 quase artesanal. De1 uma olhada na capa da edie7e3o #02.

Tue, March 13, 2012 @ 3:36 AM

3. Marie wrote:
ne3o falha. todo ano comee7a a feira e todo mundo reclama como se3o os smomes livros de sempre, como ne3o he1 nada de interessantes nos saldos, blah, blah, blah. e no fim, todos deixam algumas centenas de reais por le1 em ve1rios livros deveras interessantes.

Thu, March 15, 2012 @ 12:19 AM

4. Evan wrote:
Pelo menos me deparei com o TAZ do Hakim Bey por 4,80. Parece que tem um porto-alegrense tidiraro com a explorae7e3o da Conrad por aed.

Thu, March 15, 2012 @ 12:32 AM

5. Pawinee wrote:
achei diferente , mas o bahtrlao foi muito bem feito !qndo vao lancar sobrenatural animado!?grato,Quislon

Thu, March 15, 2012 @ 1:13 AM

6. Lee wrote:
Good to find an epexrt who knows what he's talking about!

Thu, March 15, 2012 @ 2:11 AM

7. Bolly wrote:
luiz Gomes Da camara disse:Como deria os ingleases oh my good Essa nnimea este1 de matar!Ops nnimea ne3o, essa mocinha virou mulher e muito bonitaSeu olhar de nnimea doce je1 me conquistou .belo ensaio

Thu, March 15, 2012 @ 2:58 AM

8. Matei wrote:
“There are legit­i­mate rea­sons to have empty flights. I wouldn’t use that as the sole met­ric of effectiveness.”Fair enough. I can see where an empty plane might be going some­where but is antic­i­pated to be full at its next stop and return flight, but that still doesn’t change the fact that far too many of these flights are scarcely traveled. “Near as I can tell, there wasn’t any such targeting.”You might want to share that with dc then. “Because, truth­fully, the cost of nearly every pro­gram is inconsequential.”That doesn’t mean it should be exempt.….and I’m for cut­ting waste at all lev­els. But here’s the dif­fer­ence. Take some­thing like the mil­i­tary and defense spend­ing. It’s arguably a boul­der, a big one in fact. There’s a lot of waste there but how much could we legit­i­mately cut back before we’ve neutered our­selves com­pletely? Let’s say 50% is about as much as we can tol­er­ate. Some­thing like EAS, as small as it is, really has no busi­ness eat­ing up any tax dol­lars and should prob­a­bly be 100% de-​​funded. It may be much, much smaller but pound-​​for-​​pound is far more wasteful. “About a half mil­lion per year take EAS flights, based on the lat­est num­bers I could find.”Okay, so far from being in the “mil­lions” as dc sug­gested, and that doesn’t include repeat trav­el­ers, which I’m sure account for much of the total.….when you get down to it, this is just ben­e­fit­ting a hand­ful of cit­i­zens at the expense of every­one else. “I don’t think this is true. Many are located within an hour’s drive of a regional airport”Yeah, I didn’t por­tray that too well.…many are located near regional air­ports as you sug­gest and some are located near national air­ports, but the dis­tance to int’l air­ports, on aver­age, is pretty far. Still, if you live that far removed from pop­u­lated soci­ety, you should shoul­der the bur­den of the cost of travel to get you there and back.

Tue, April 10, 2012 @ 9:26 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.